Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

DailyflyDailyfly

National News

U.S. Supreme Court Hands Texas Another Legal Victory on Biden’s Immigration Policies

(The Center Square) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday handed Texas another legal win in an ongoing lawsuit over the Department of Homeland Security’s deportation policy.

Associate Justice Samuel Alito, the Circuit Justice for the Fifth Circuit, denied a request made by the Biden administration to issue a stay of a federal district court’s ruling in favor of Texas. Alito denied the request after the Fifth Circuit denied the same request after a lower court ruling.

Alito granted the administration’s request to have the full Supreme Court hear the case, and he scheduled it for the first week of December.

The lower district court’s nationwide injunction preventing DHS from enforcing its more lax deportation policies remains in effect.

After the decision, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said, “Texas is handing [President Joe] Biden so many huge loses. First Biden tells DHS they don’t have to detain criminal illegals. Court strikes down. Biden appeals. Loses. Biden goes to SCOTUS. Just now, loses again! Feds MUST detain illegals. I’ll keep fighting in court until they do their job!”

At issue is DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas altering the enforcement of federal immigration law regading deportation through the issuance of memorandums and directives. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry sued, arguing they violate federal law established by Congress, including the Administrative Procedures Act.

In June, U.S. District Judge Drew Tipton issued a nationwide injunction halting the policy, ruling it was “arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, and failing to observe procedure under the Administrative Procedure Act.” He also denied all other requested relief brought by the administration.

In December, the justices will hear arguments about whether Texas and Louisiana have standing to challenge the DHS guidance and whether the guidelines are contrary to federal law and violate the APA.

Alito, in his Thursday ruling. said that four justices would have granted the application for a stay on the lower court’s decision: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

RJ Hauman, communications director for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), told The Center Square, “The Biden administration’s move to severely limit immigration enforcement was another in a long line of decisions that sought to worsen – not fix – historic levels of illegal immigration into our country. ICE exists to enforce our immigration laws and keep the American people safe. The enforcement priorities sought to do the opposite.”